Editorial note: This outline is a sketchy draft so far. We will welcome reminders of all the important developments and connections that it omits. We expect that our cooperation with the Bancroft Library will enable us to make the texts of many documents from 1965 available here by late 2000. We invite others who care, to help us make documents from later years available online. Meanwhile, we intend to elaborate this outline with useful references to published accounts and interpretations. We hope that other veterans and scholars familiar with aspects of this local history will help us gather references, source documents, and unpublished materials -- particularly their own, and of personal character -- that may be put on line, to illuminate the complex era of developments that followed the FSM.


Renewed Civil Rights activity [1965-66]


Vietnam Day [early 65] -- Vietnam Day Committee [mid-1965-69?]


Linkage with Farmworkers organizing [1965-66]


Free University of Berkeley [1965-72?]


Developments in campus and youth ministeries


Radical electoral activism challenging liberals


Feminist activism sprouts locally [early 1966?]


Publications and media:


Related phenomena of free expression:



IN SYMPATHY:

Student movements and demonstrations on other campuses


International responses and echoes


IN REACTION:

College administrations develop protest-containment strategies [1965-72]


State Senate Subcommittee on Un-American Activities report [1965]


Intensified surveillance and infiltration of radical groups [1965 onward]


Rise of prosecutor Edwin Meese in Oakland D.A. heirarchy [1964-66]

-- local systems integration of political surveillance [1966-70?]
-- national integration [1980s]
-- Attorney General under Reagan


Media-driven reaction to FSM, VDC, youth challenging authority

-- Ronald Reagan's election as governor [1966] -- Presidency [1980-88]


Far Reflections of the FSM's Flare

During the pregnant years and long decades after 1964, many of the FSM's participants matured to carry its core principles of democratic engagement and expression into practice in a remarkable variety of ways. Their distinctive, individual contributions have influenced the development of environmental activism, the new cuisine, progressive assets management, micro-radio broadcasting, educational reform, cybernetic information systems, and dozens of other fields. Few found the FSM to be the only experience informing their social perspectives, for its intense moment passed in a prolonged, rich cultural surround; but for most, it remained central and indelible, and for many, transformative. What we each made from the shared impulse has turned out to be no less various than our lives, and in no one's expressed completely. Yet still a certain harmony, oft-faltering but definite, may be recognized within the diversity of our works, as the democratizing legacy of the FSM.

Though no sociologist or cultural historian has yet had occasion and means to study a creature of this sort -- a large congress of a narrow cohort, unified briefly in historically-transformative experience of a social idea, bearing its biography in their own biographies, extending now half a lifetime in wide dispersal through the realms of society -- we dream of making this possible, and plan modest beginnings. Linked to the page Who Was Involved..., we will post brief accounts of noteable and interesting work by FSM veterans. The Bancroft Library's oral history project will produce many transcribed passages of reflection about the FSM's influence on people's subsequent work; we plan to make them accessible here, with interviewees' permission. We invite other participants to contribute to such dimensions of the FSM's collective biograpy. However brief be the information you share, it will prove meaningful to someone down the line, and richer reflections still more so.

  This page last changed 20 March, 2002
URL: http://www.fsm-a.org/stacks/covers/comm-consq_cvr.html.html